The Berean Expositor
Volume 33 - Page 173 of 253
Index | Zoom
The correspondence of the two epistles places together the two outstanding thoughts
of the Prize and the Crown. There are some who see a difficulty here. They say that in
Phil. 3: 14, the Apostle has a Prize in view, whereas in II Tim. 4: 8, it is a Crown, and
that these different words must refer to different things. But is this so? We can deal with
the objection in two ways, either of which will show that the conclusion drawn is false.
Let us suppose that an athlete enters for a competition. It is announced that the winner of
"The 500 yards" will receive a prize. He runs the race and comes in first, and on the
appointed day goes forward to the dais, where a lady has honoured the Sports Club by
consenting to give the Prizes. One after another of the successful competitors have gone
forward, received their Prize, bowed and retired, amid the cheers of their fellows. Our
"500 yards" winner now goes forward, and the lady, with a gracious smile, hands him a
silver cup. To the amazement of all present he refuses the cup on the ground that he
expected a "Prize". The thing is too ridiculous to continue--no one in his senses could
ever entertain such an objection. If instead of a silver cup the lady had presented him
with a purse of money, a live pig, a ticket for a cruise, it would still have constituted the
Prize. Without being formal logicians each of us acts in such circumstances as though
they had actually reasoned the matter out thus:--
GENUS (Prize).
SPECIES.
Silver Cup. Live Pig. Purse of money. Ticket for cruise.
just as is done in countless other cases, such as when we speak of a flower.
GENUS (A Flower).
SPECIES.
Rose.
Lily.
Buttercup.  Orchid.
Hawthorn.
There are some, however, who look with suspicion upon "Logic", forgetting that
without reason and rule language itself would be but a collection of words.
We are, however, happy in being able to turn from any appearance of "reasoning" to
the Scriptures themselves. We feel sure that, given his belief in the inspiration and
authority of the Scriptures, the most strenuous opponent would agree with the following
line of investigation and proof. Paul uses the words "Prize" and "Crown" in Phil. 3:
and II Tim. 4:, and uses them in contexts that both state and imply the figurative
background of a race or athletic effort. If this same Paul, in a similar context, brings
together Prize and Crown in such a manner as to leave no doubt that the Crown is the
Prize in view, then we have settled beyond controversy two things, namely:
(1)
In Paul's estimation, Prize and Crown are related as Genus and Species, and,
(2)
A Prize, in Paul's usage, is something that may be won by effort or lost by
negligence, and therefore must not be confused with a gift in grace, which is
categorically declared to be "not of works".
The student of the Scriptures knows quite well that Paul has done all that we here
claim. Here is the passage:--