The Berean Expositor
Volume 24 - Page 23 of 211
Index | Zoom
The accusation set over the Lord's head on the cross was: "This is Jesus the King of
the Jews" (Matt. 27: 37).
The chief priests mocked Him with taunting words:--
"If He be the King of Israel, let Him now come down from the cross, and we will
believe Him" (Matt. 27: 42).
The dying malefactor said unto Jesus:--
"Lord, remember me when Thou comest into Thy KINGDOM" (Luke 23: 42).
When the Lord answered the apostle's question it is surely significant that He said no
word to reprove them for their slowness of heart: neither did He say that they were fools.
All that He did was to take up that part of their question which related to the "time",
saying: "It is not for you to know the time or the seasons, which the Father hath put in
His own power" (Acts 1: 7). Yet in Luke 24:, before His exposition of Moses and all
the Prophets, they had merited these rebukes.
The kingdom shall be restored to Israel, and upon the fulfillment of conditions already
laid down, but it was impossible to reveal to the apostles the foreknown failure of Israel
to repent, and the consequent postponement of the hope of Israel. That is understandable
and true, but it does not in any way invalidate their question as to the restoration of the
kingdom. It gives no warrant for substituting the church in the place of Israel.
If, while Israel were still a people, and while prophetic times were still running their
course (Dan. 9: 24), the apostles were not permitted to know "times and seasons", how
much less, during this period of Israel's blindness--this parenthetical period during
which the clock of prophecy has been stopped--how much less warrant is there for
attempting to fix dates concerning the end of the age or the coming of the Lord. We have
not a list of names of all those who from time to time have turned prophets and
announced the date of the second coming, nor do we wish to be cumbered with such sad
evidences of error, but the reader should be warned against all such attempts, by whatever
method--all are unscriptural and doomed to failure. Captain Crossby announced that in
1925 this dispensation would close, and that the most conspicuous figure in Europe at
that date would be Antichrist. We neither saw Antichrist in 1925, nor did the age end
seven years later, namely 1932, with Israel restored to their land. Baxter toured the
country lecturing upon the forty coming wonders that should be seen during 1896-1908;
Not one came to pass. Dimbleby computed by astronomical reckoning that the end would
come in 1898. During the year in which we write these words claims have been made to
divine illumination, illumination that, if resisted, would mean resistance of the Holy
Ghost. These claims were that the teaching of the Scriptures had been made plain, and
that about 12th June, 1933, the coming of the Lord, according to I Thess. 4:, would be
fulfilled. Newspapers ridiculed the prophet in advance: unstable believers were moved
to all sorts of extravagancies by it--and nothing happened. Nothing, we say; yet, is it
nothing that the Word of God should be thus held up to scorn? Is it nothing that the faith
of many has been so rudely shaken? What difference should it make, if we positively