107. THE PRINCIPLE
UNDERLYING THE QUOTATIONS
FROM THE OLD TESTAMENT IN THE NEW.
It is a fact that in quotations from the Old Testament the Greek text
sometimes differs from the Hebrew.
The difficulties found in connection with this subject arise from our
thinking and speaking only of the human agent as the writer, instead of
having regard to the fact the the Word of God is the record of the words
which He Himself employed when He spoke "at sundry times and in divers
manners" (Heb. 1:1, see Ap. 95); and from not remembering (or believing)
that "holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost" (2Pet.
1:27, and cp. Matt. 15:4. Mark 12:36. Acts 1:16; 3:18; 28:25.
Heb. 3:7; 9:8; 10:15).
If we believe that throughout the Scriptures we have the words of God,
and not of man, all difficulties vanish. The difficulties are created
by first assuming that we are dealing with merely human documents, and
then denying the Divine Speaker and Author the right that is claimed by
every human writer for himself. It thus seems that man may take any liberty he chooses in quoting, adapting,
or repeating in a varied form his own previously written words; but that
he denies the Divine Author of the Holy Scripture the right to deal in
the same manner with His own words. This is the cause of all the
so called "discrepancies" and "difficulties" arising from man's ignorance.
The Holy Spirit, in referring to words which He has before caused to
be written in connection with the special circumstances of each particular
case, frequently refers to them again in relation to different circumstances
and other cases. He could have employed other words had He chosen
to do so; but it has pleased Him to repeat His own words, introducing them
in different connections, with other applications, and in new senses.
All these things are done, and words are even sometimes changed, in
order to bring out some new truth for our learning. This is lost
upon us when we charge upon God our own ignorance, and the supposed infirmities
of human agencies.
One great source of such difficulties is our failure to note the difference
between what is said to be "spoken", and what is said to be "written".
If we introduce the latter assumption when the former is definitely stated,
we at once create our own "discrepancy". True, by a figure of speech
we can say that an author has said a certain thing when he has written it; but we may not say that he spoke it when he distinctly says
that he wrote it, or vice versa. Some prophecies were
spoken and not written; some were written by not spoken; while others were
both spoken and written.
There is surely, all the difference in the world between to rhethen = that which was spoken, and ho gegraptai = that which standeth
written. If we deliberately substitute the one for the other, of
course there is a discrepancy; but it is of our own creating. This
at once disposes of two of the greatest and most serious of so called discrepancies,
Matt. 2:23 and 27:9 (see Ap. 161).
One other consideration will help us when the quotations are prophecies.
Prophecies are the utterances of Jehovah; and Jehovah is He Who was, and
is, and is to come -- the Eternal. His words therefore partake of
His attributes, and may often have a past and present as well as future
reference and fulfillment (See Ap. 103); and (1) a prophecy may refer to
the then present circumstance under which it is spoken; (2) it may have
a further and subsequent reference to some great crises, which does not
exhaust it; and (3) it may require a final reference, which shall be the
consummation, and which shall fill it full, and thus be said to fulfill
Certain prophecies may therefore have a preterite reference, as well
as a future fulfillment; but these are too often separated, and the
part is put for the whole, one truth being used to
upset another truth, to the contempt of Divine utterances, and to the destruction
of brotherly love.
The principles underlying the New Testament quotations were fully set
out by SOLOMON GLASSIUS (A.D. 1623) in his great work (written in Latin)
entitled, Philologia Sacra, chapter on "Gnomes"; and, as this has
never been improved upon, we follow it here.
The notes on the N.T. passages must be consulted for further information,
e.g. Luke 4:18 (II. 1, below).
- As to their INTERNAL form : i.e. the
as distinct from the words :--
- Where the sense originally intended by the Holy Spirit is
preserved, though the words may vary.
Matt. 1:23 (Isa. 7:13,14), "spoken", see above. Matt. 2:6 (Mic.
5:2); 3:3 (Isa. 40:3); 11:10 (*1) (Mal. 3:1); 12:17 (Isa. 42:1-4); 13:14,
15 (*s) (Isa. 6:9, 10); 21:16 (*s) (Ps. 8:2); 21:42 (*s) (Ps. 118:22, 23);
22:44 (*s) (Ps. 110:1); 26:31 (Zech. 13:7); 27:35 (*s) (Ps. 22:18); Mark
15:28 (Isa. 53:12). Luke 4:18-21 (Isa. 61:1, 2). John 19:37
(Zech. 12:10); Acts 3:22, 23 (*s) (Deut. 18:15-19); 13:33 (*s) (Ps. 2:7);
15:16, 17 (Amos 9:11, 12). Rom. 14:11 (Isa. 45:23); 15:3 (*s) (Ps.
69:9); 15:12 (*s) (Isa. 11:1, 10). Eph. 4:8 (Ps. 68:18). Heb.
1:8, 9 (*s) (Ps. 45:6, 7); 1:10-13 (*s) (Ps. 102:25); 5:6 and 7:17, 21
(Ps. 110:4); 10:5, 6 (*s) (Ps. 40:6-9. See below, II. 3. a).
1Pet. 2:6 (*s) (Isa. 28:16).
- Where the original sense is modified, and used with a new
and different application.
Matt. 12:40 (Jonah 1:17). John 3:14, 15 (Num. 21:8, 9); 19:36
(Ex. 12:46). Eph. 5:31, 32 (Gen. 2:23, 24)
- Where the sense is ACCOMMODATED,
from its first use, and is adapted to quite a different event or circumstance.
Matt. 2:15 (*h) (Hos. 11:1); 2:17, 18 (Jer. 31:15); 8:17 (*h) (Isa.
53:4); 13:35, "spoken" (Ps. 78:2); 15:8, 9 (Isa. 29:13); 27:9, 10
(*2) Acts 13:40, 41 (*s) (Hab. 1:5). Rom. 9: 27, 28 (*s*) (Isa. 10:22,
23); 9:29 (*s) (Isa. 1:9); 10:6 (*s), 7, 8 (*s) (Deut. 30:12-14).
1Cor. 1:19, 20 (Isa. 29:14; 33:18); 10:6 (Ex. 32:6-25). Rev. 1:7
(Zech. 12:10); 1:17 (Isa. 41:4); 11:4 (Zech. 4:3, 11, 14).
- As to their EXTERNAL form : i.e. the words,
as distinct from the sense.
- Where the words are from the Hebrew text or Septuagint version.
Matt. 12:7 (Hos. 6:6); 22:32 (*h) (Ex. 3:6); Mark 12:26 (*h) (Ex. 3:6);
11:17 (*h) (Isa. 56:17) Jer. 7:11). Luke 4:18 (Isa.
- Where the words are varied by omission, addition, or transposition.
Matt. 4:10 (Deut. 6:13; 10:20); 4:15, 16 (Isa. 9:1, 2); 5:31 (Deut.
24:1); 5:38 (Ex. 21:24. Lev. 24:20); 12:18-21 (Isa. 42:1-4);
19:5 (*s) (Gen. 2:24); 22:24 (Deut. 25:5, 6). Rom. 11:3, 4 (1Kings 19:10,
14, 18). 1Cor 2:9 (Isa. 64:4); 14:21 (Isa. 28:11, 12) 1Pet.
1:24, 25 (Isa. 40:6-8).
- Where the words are changed, by a various reading, or by
an inference, or in Number, Person, Mood, or Tense.
The necessity for this is constantly experienced today in adapting a
quotation for any special purpose beyond its original intention.
It is no less authoritative as Scripture, nor does it alter the Word of
- By a different reading.
Heb. 10:5 (*s) (Ps.
40:6; see the notes in both passages).
- By an inference.
Matt. 2:6 (Micah 5:2).
See notes. Acts 7:43 (Amos 5:25-27)
Rom. 9:27 (*s) (Isa. 10:22);
9:29 (Isa. 1:9); 9:23 (Isa. 28:16);
Eph. 4:8 (Ps. 68:18).
- In Number.
Matt. 4:7 (Deut. 6:16),
Rom. 4:7 (Ps. 32:1); Rom. 10:15 (Isa. 52:7).
- Where two or more citations are combined. Composite
This is a common practice in all literature.
PLATO (429 - 347 B.C.) Ion, p. 538, connects two lines
from HOMER (about 850 B.C.), one from Iliad, xi. 1. 638, and the
other from I. 630.
XENOPHON ( 430 - 357 B.C.) Memorabilia, Bk. I. ch. 2, §
58, gives as one quotation two passages from Homer (Iliad, ii. 188,
&c., and 198, &c.)
LUCIAN (A.D. 160) in his Charon, § 22, combines five
lines together from HOMER from different passages (Iliad, ix. 319,
320; and Odyssey, x. 521, and xi. 539).
PLUTARCH (about A.D. 46) in his Progress in Virtue, combines
in one sentence Homer (Odyssey, vi. 187, and xxiv. 402).
CICERO (106 - 43 B.C.), De Oratore, Bk. II. § 80, combines
in two lines parts of Terence's lines (Andria, 115, 116, Parry's
PHILO (20 B.C. - A.D. 40) in Who is the Heir of Divine Things
(§ 5), quotes, as one address of Moses, parts of two others (Num.
11:13 and 22). In the same treatise (§ 46) he combines parts
of Gen 17:19 and 18:14.
Illustrations could be given from English authors.
Man may make a mistake in doing this, but not so the Holy Spirit.
In Matt. 21:5, Isa. 62:11 is combined with Zech.
In Matt. 21:13, Isa. 56:7 is combined with Jer.
In Mark 1:2, 3, Mal. 3:1 is combined with Isa. 40:3.
In Luke 1:16, 17, Mal. 4:5, 6 is combined with 3:1.
In Luke 3:4,.5, Mal. 3:1 is combined with Isa. 40:3.
In Acts 1:20, Ps. 69:25 is combined with 109:8.
In Rom. 3:10-12, Eccles. 7:20 is combined with Ps.
14:2, 3 and 53:2, 3.
In Rom. 3:13-18, Ps. 5:9 is combined with Isa. 59:7,
8 and Ps. 36:1.
In Rom. 9:33, Isa. 28:16 is combined with 8:14.
In Rom. 11:26, 27 (*s) Isa. 59:20, 21 is combined
In 1Cor. 15:54-56, Isa. 25:8 is combined with Hos.
In 2Cor. 6:16, Lev. 26:11 is combined with Ezek.
In Gal. 3:8, Gen. 12:3 is combined with 18:18.
In 1Pet. 2:7, 8, Ps. 118:22 is combined with Isa.
- Where quotations are made from secular writers.
See notes on Acts 17:22, 23, and 28. 1Cor. 15:33. Col. 2:21.
(*1) And the parallel passages in the other Gospels, which can
be easily found.
(*s) This denotes that it agrees with the Septuagint Version
in these cases, and not with the Hebrew.
(*s*) It denotes that it is nearly, but not exactly, the same.
(*h) This denotes that it agrees with the Hebrew, but not with
the Septuagint Version.
(*2) This was "spoken", not written, and is therefore not a quotation.
See Ap. 161.
Home | About LW | Site Map | LW Publications | Search
Developed by ©
Levend Water All rights reserved