An Alphabetical Analysis
Volume 7 - Doctrinal Truth - Page 38 of 297
INDEX
though we have all this evidence that Israel, literal Israel, the covenant
and oath to Abraham, and the burden of all the Old Testament prophets was the
topic uppermost in all minds, teachers and preachers nevertheless persist in
reading into all these Scriptures 'the church' and 'the gospel', even though
Paul himself has most definitely assured them that the ministry of Christ was
primarily to 'confirm' promises already made to the 'fathers'.
In chapter 2, Luke gives in great detail the circumstances of the birth
of Christ, introduces the shepherds, but omits the wise men, and records one
more inspired song, this time by Simeon.  To this most vital and glorious
record we must devote the following section, recognizing that if all the
preparation indicated in chapter 1 be epoch making, how much more so must be
the event unto which all the prophets since the utterance of the primal
prophecy of Genesis 3:15 have looked forward with wondrous expectation.
Repentance and its fruits
Luke has conducted our studies from 'the days of Herod', in which the
birth of John the Baptist was announced (Luke 1:5), until 'the day of his
shewing unto Israel' (Luke 1:80), during which we have learned also of the
annunciation of the angel Gabriel to Mary.  The actual birth of the Saviour
is then given in detail and the second chapter ends on a note very similar to
that which closes chapter 1, namely that, like John, the Saviour 'increased
in wisdom and stature, and in favour with God and man' (Luke 2:52 cf. 1:80).
The dates given by Luke in chapters 1 and 2 are not specific, but with the
opening of chapter 3 with the Baptism and Anointing of the Saviour, the
dating is precise.  There is no other date in the New Testament that
approaches that given in Luke 3:1,2.  John the Baptist's 'shewing' with
Israel is thus dated:
'In the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar,
Pontius Pilate being governor of Judaea, and
Herod being tetrarch of Galilee, and
His brother Philip tetrarch of Ituraea and of the region of
Trachonitis, and
Lysanias the tetrarch of Abilene.
Annas and Caiaphas being the high priests' (Luke 3:1,2).
Tiberius Claudius Drusus Nero, to give Tiberius his full name,
succeeded his step-father Augustus; he died a.d. 37, after reigning 21 years.
In the 15th year of his reign John the Baptist first appeared, and the
crucifixion of Jesus Christ took place in the third or fourth year
afterwards.  The Herod, who is here said to be tetrarch of Galilee, must not
be confused with the Herod who reigned at the time of the birth of Christ
(Matt. 2:1; Luke 1:5).  Primarily, a tetrarch implies one who governs over a
fourth part of a country, but the title was given to governors of a province,
whether their government extended to a fourth part or more; indeed, Josephus
informs us that after the death of Herod the Great, his kingdom was divided
among his three sons Archelaus, Philip and Antipas.  It seems strange to us
to read of two high priests Annas and Caiaphas.  Caiaphas was the son-in-law
of Annas, who had been deprived of the office by Valerus Gratus, governor of
Judaea.
'Caiaphas was the High Priest as successor of Aaron; while Annas was
the Nasi, or head of the Sanhedrin (as successor of Moses), and thus
associated with Caiaphas in government' (The Companion Bible).