| An Alphabetical Analysis Volume 3 - Dispensational Truth - Page 7 of 222 INDEX | |
Quotations are made in answer to this question from two teachers among
the early Brethren, namely C. H. Macintosh, and Richard Holden.
`The thought of a church composed of Jew and Gentile "seated together
in the heavenlies" lay far beyond (our emphasis) the range of prophetic
testimony .... We may range through the inspired pages of the law and
the prophets, from one end to the other and find no solution of "the
great Mystery" of the Church ... . Peter received the keys of the
kingdom, and he used these keys, first to open the kingdom to the Jew,
and then to the Gentile. But Peter never received a commission to
unfold the mystery of the church' (Life and Times of Elijah the
Tishbite).
How strange to find C. H. M. and C. H. W. saying the same things, yet
how strange to note the way in which `The Brethren' have honoured the one,
and repudiated the other!
In 1870 Richard Holden wrote a work entitled:
`The Mystery, the Special Mission of the
apostle
Paul.
the Key to the Present Dispensation'.
Here is a brief quotation from this very precious testimony.
`To make all see what is the dispensation, or in other words, to be the
divinely -appointed instructor in the character and order of the
present time, as Moses was in the dispensation of "law", is that
special feature in the commission of Paul in which it was distinct from
that of the other apostles .... If then it shall appear, that, far
from seeing "what is the dispensation of the Mystery" the mass of
Christians have entirely missed it, and, as the natural consequence
have almost completely misunderstood Christianity, importing into it
the things proper to another dispensation, and so confounding Judaism
and Christianity in an inexpressible jumble, surely it is a matter for
deep humiliation before God, and for earnest, prayerful effort to
retrieve with God's help, this important and neglected teaching'.
It seems almost unbelievable that a movement that could produce such a
testimony, could nevertheless perpetuate that `inexpressible jumble' namely
of confusing the new covenant or testament, made only `with the house of
Israel and with the house of Judah' (Jer. 31:31), and make it the very centre
of that worship and assembly, thereby `confounding Judaism' with the truth of
the Church of the Mystery, the present dispensation and calling, in which no
covenant new or old finds a place, but a choice and a promise made `before
the foundation of the world'.
The prophet Hosea makes it abundantly clear that:
(1). A time would come when Israel would temporarily cease to be God's
people, and when the Lord would cease to be their God (Hos. 1:9).
(2). This condition is likened to the segregation of a woman who had
been unfaithful, the woman abiding many days belonging to no other man,
the Lord saying `so will I also be for thee' (Hos. 3:3).
(3). This is interpreted of Israel's condition from the time this
rejection is entered until the Second Coming of the Lord.
`For the children of Israel shall abide many days
(a)
Without a king, and without a prince, and