| The Berean Expositor Volume 52 - Page 18 of 207 Index | Zoom | |
How does our love for the Lord Jesus Christ compare to the love of Ruth for Naomi?
Are we willing to sacrifice anything for Him? Are we willing to go all the way?
We have considered together the Book of Ruth as a whole and the opening chapter.
How that in this very lovely story the hero Boaz reveals to us in type that most
important aspect of the relationship between the Lord Jesus Christ and His Children--our
Kinsman-Redeemer. The importance of this little Book is also that it supplies an
essential link in the genealogy of the Lord Jesus Christ as the Son of David.
Also that it opens up to us that wonderful aspect of redemption which is not that of
forgiveness, i.e. setting free from bondage, but the possession of an inheritance and that
inheritance is to be enjoyed for eternity.
The journey that Naomi and Ruth made from the land of Moab to Bethlehem in Judah
was a long and toilsome one and not free from danger. Two rivers had to be crossed, the
Arnon and the Jordan. The distance of actual journeying cannot be less than 50 miles. A
weary haul needing tremendous resolution and courage on the part of both women.
At last tired out and travel stained, they arrived at their destination. Naomi must have
been well known in Bethlehem before leaving for Moab, for we read there was no small
stir among the local inhabitants, when it became known she had returned. The strain of
the journey must have greatly taxed her strength, and added to that the grief she had
sustained by the loss of both husband and sons had doubtless made her look aged and
worn in appearance. Despite these things and after many years of absence, many in
Bethlehem recognized her when at last she arrived back in her native town. The women
would have enquired as to how she had fare in far off Moab? How poignant are the
words she used in her reply:
"And she said unto them, Call me not Naomi, call me Mara: for the Almighty hath
dealt very bitterly with me. I went out full, and the Lord hath brought me home again
empty: why then call ye me Naomi, seeing the Lord hath testified against me, and the
Almighty hath afflicted me?" (1: 20-21).
Here is no passionate outburst against the providence of God, but a calm reasoned
explanation of the facts. She had gone out with husband and sons, and come back having
left them buried in a foreign land. Yet there was no hysterical railing against the hand of
the Lord, on the contrary, we find a gentle acceptance of this judgment. She went out a
wife and a mother and returned a widow with no sons. Yet despite this we read of no
murmuring or complaints, but a calm resignation to the will of God. The actual title
Naomi used was "Shaddai", our translation, "the Almighty". This is not the title of
Creator, which is "Elohim", but His title as the "Giver", the all-bountiful One. The One
Who supplies all the needs of His children, the God of grace. It was first used in
Gen.xvii.1 where it is put to show Abraham that He Who called him out to walk alone
before Him could supply all his need. Call me not Naomi `sweetness', call me Mara
`bitterness'; see the play upon the word here--"for the Almighty hath dealt very bitterly
with me". She said in effect--"It is He Who gives, it is He Who takes back". This word
`mara' is vividly brought before us in Exod. 15: The Lord had brought His people out