The Berean Expositor
Volume 48 - Page 72 of 181
Index | Zoom
we would find still more of God beyond that--and so on, without end. The Father IS
God, but beyond is infinitely more: the Son IS God, but beyond is the Father.
Because of the nature of this study we cannot speak of `proofs'; but insofar as the
word may justly be used, the final `proof' must be the inferred identification of Himself
by the Lord Jesus Christ, with Jehovah.
In Exod. 3: 14 "God said unto Moses, I AM THAT I AM . . . . . I AM
hath sent unto you."
In John's Gospel the Lord uses the expression "I AM" on a number of occasions,
which associated with Jehovah. John 10: 11, 14:
"I am (ego eimi, very emphatic) the good shepherd . . . . .".
"I am (ego eimi) the good shepherd, and know My sheep."
Surely only one can be described as "the good shepherd", yet, emphatically, the Lord
Jesus Christ says "I am the good shepherd". David, in Psa. 23:, says "The Lord
(Jehovah) is my shepherd". This psalm summarizes the title of Jehovah, and it is difficult
not to see in the claim "I am the good shepherd" the claim also to the titles of Jehovah.
We refer to only one more of the great ego eimi statements of the Lord Jesus Christ,
that recorded in John 18: 3-8, the arrest of the Lord. In response to His question
"Whom seek ye?", those who had come to take Him said "Jesus of Nazareth". To this He
said "I am" (the "he" is not in the original), ego eimi. At this `they went backward, and
fell to the ground'. Similarly in verse 8 the Lord again says "I am (ego eimi)". Some try
to explain the reaction of the men and officers from the chief priests and Pharisees as
simply surprise that the One they had come to arrest should admit to being the One they
wanted. Is there really anything in that to call for such an extreme reaction? It seems
much more likely that the words were uttered with such authority and majesty that for the
moment they were aware of the deity of the One they had come to arrest. Police officers
do not normally react to "It's a fair cop" in such an extreme way.
In our apprehension of the deity of the Lord Jesus Christ a great deal depends upon the
standpoint from which we approach the subject. If we begin with the babe at Bethlehem,
and the man Jesus of Nazareth, then it is impossible for us to begin to understand. How
can a man be God? If, on the other hand, we begin with God reaching out to lost
mankind, seeking a means of touching them, making Himself known, and redeeming
them, the possibility of God becoming man is not so remote. We may not be able to
understand; but it is not impossible. The lesser cannot assume the characteristics of the
greater; but the greater may well in His Wisdom and for His Purpose assume "the
likeness of sinful flesh".