| The Berean Expositor Volume 44 - Page 145 of 247 Index | Zoom | |
have taught that there are seven dispensations which they equate with time divided up
into seven periods. This is a mistake, as time, basically, does not enter into this word.
Three times it is translated "stewardship" in Luke 16: 2, 3, 4, & "edifying" in I Tim. 1: 4,
and the root idea is of one who is put in charge of the administration of a household, an
overseer or bailiff. Twice the apostle Paul declares that he had been given a dispensation
(Eph. 3: 2; Col. 1: 25). No period of time had been entrusted to him, but a body of truth
connected with the Church, the Body of Christ, had been committed to him by the risen
and ascended Christ Jesus, and for this he was its steward or minister, as these verses
testify.
Because some have misunderstood or abused the word dispensation, this does not
justify the rejection of dispensational truth as error. In every class and society there are
those who act in an unbalanced way. One might as well reject Christianity because some
have been such poor practical exponents of it. It should surely be obvious that these two
aspects of Scriptural truth must be distinguished or confusion is bound to result. Nor
must one be stressed and the other forgotten, otherwise an erroneous conception of God's
Word will dominate the mind. In practice, every one who accepts the Bible as the Word
of God and the regulator of their daily life is bound to be a dispensationalist. The very
fact that such do not make any attempt to carry out animal sacrifices for sin, as mentioned
before, shows that they regard such regulations as not being truth for today, however
much they believe the Bible, and however true these commands were in the Old
Testament times. The Mosaic ritual of the law was a dispensation, or administration of
Divine truth, for a limited period only, and Moses was its steward. It was not basic for all
time and has been superseded since the coming of the great Antitype, the Lord Jesus
Christ, Who has fulfilled the type and shadow of the ceremonial law.
A practical following out of the historico-grammatical system of interpretation will
assuredly lead to a distinguishing between these two most important aspects of revealed
Truth, leading to a greater clarification and understanding of the great redemptive
purpose of God. In fact it will lead to a practical realization of what the apostle Paul
prayed for the Philippian believers, a spiritual perception enabling such to "try the things
that differ" (1: 10, margin) or as the main text "approve things that are excellent". When
things differ, they do so not only in external ways, such as shape and size, but in internal
quality, and it is only by recognizing and distinguishing these that we can get the best.
Abraham was a practical example of this attitude of mind. God had unconditionally
given him and his posterity an earthly inheritance (Gen. 13: 14-17; 15: 12-18). The
Epistle to the Hebrews records by inspiration what the Old Testament leaves out, namely
that to Abraham God gave a vision of the heavenly Jerusalem, very much as the apostle
John received in Rev. 21: Chapter 11: of Hebrews describes this as a "better country"
(11: 16), and a city which God has built (verse 10). Abraham "tried the things that differ"
and found what was "more excellent". "Better" is one of the key words of Hebrews;
there are seven things described by God as "better" (Heb. 1: 4; 7: 7, 19; 8: 6; 9: 23;
10: 34; 11: 35). If we want the best, then we shall have to consider carefully and
prayerfully the Epistles to the Ephesians and Colossians where the high-water mark of
revelation is reached.