The Berean Expositor
Volume 43 - Page 34 of 243
Index | Zoom
"As many as would be perfect" (Phil. 3: 15) are exhorted positively to follow the
example of Paul; and negatively to avoid the example of those whose end is perdition.
Now it does not seem possible that a church that had reached such a height of spiritual
experience as that attained by the Philippians should need to be solemnly warned not to
follow the example of the ungodly. Those who were more likely to cause a slip and
possibly a forfeiture were those believers who were following the policy expressed in the
words, "making the best of both worlds". These caused the apostle to weep as he spoke
of their walk, and summarized it as the walk of those who were:
"The enemies of the cross of Christ: whose end is perdition (A.V. destruction),
whose God is their belly, and whose glory is in their shame, who mind earthly things"
(Phil. 3: 18, 19).
The last statement proves that those enemies are not the unsaved, for how can an
unsaved man mind anything else but earthly things? To believers Paul can write, "Set
your mind on things above, not on things on the earth" (Col. 3: 2). Such believers as
those Philippians referred to in 3: 18, 19 constitute themselves the enemies of the cross
of Christ, for that cross speaks of separation from the things of the flesh and the world.
Keeping this passage in mind we look at the third, viz. The Sermon on the Mount
(Matt. 5:-7:).  The exhortation to endure, to suffer with the reward of the earthly
kingdom in view, has only to be mentioned to be accepted as the main theme of this
sermon. Its goal is expressed in Matt. 5: 48, "Be ye therefore perfect, even as your
Father which is in heaven is perfect". The word perdition comes later, in Matt. 7: 13,
"Broad is the way, that leadeth to perdition (A.V. destruction)".  The passage
immediately goes on to say, "by their fruits ye shall know them" (verse 20).
Here we have three occasions where these words occurs as the two poles of their
respective contexts. Still the question remains, What is intended by the word perdition?
Perdition, as some of its contexts indicate, can mean utter destruction, as of the Man of
Sin, but if we could only find a passage where the word is used without any doctrinal or
theological meaning we could then understand how such a word could be used of so
vastly different subjects. In the providence of God such a passage exists, and moreover is
used by Matthew who has provided one of the sets already:
"There came unto him a woman having an alabaster box of very precious ointment
. . . . . To what purpose is this WASTE (perdition)?" (Matt. 26: 7, 8).
Before proceeding, let us be sure we understand the meaning of the alternative,
"perfection". Teleios is cognate with telos, and telos means the end, the goal. To go on
unto perfection is to reach one's goal. That this is innate in the word, two passages will
show. In Phil. 3: 12 Paul explains what he means by being perfect, by adding, "That I
may apprehend that for which I am also apprehended of Christ Jesus", and in Gal. 3: 3
he places "perfected" in antithesis to "begin": "Having begun in the spirit, are ye now
made perfect (ended, as it were, finished) by the flesh?" Perdition set over against
perfectness then means to end in waste instead of in triumph. Therein lies the tragedy of
drawing back. The foundation is laid, the builder will be saved, but he may be saved yet