The Berean Expositor
Volume 40 - Page 22 of 254
Index | Zoom
Eph. 2: 16 will be proof against any attempt to teach universal reconciliation irrespective
of the limitations of the Mystery, or from the related theme in Col. 1: 16-22.
`In the flesh' finds its echo in Eph. 3: 5 `in Spirit', which, when we reach that
passage, we hope to show stands at the head of the threefold fellowship of verse six.
While the flesh in all men is the same, yet it did not disqualify the Jew as we have seen in
Rom. 9: 3-5, from dispensational privilege, but it did the Gentile. What depths of
degradation and misery are found in the words `in the flesh' and `in the world', and
between them lies the whole case of Gentile disability, contained in the terms
uncircumcision, without Christ, aliens, strangers, no hope, and without God.
`Without Christ' choris Christou. As the A.V. stands we are likely to look at the
two expressions `without Christ' and `without God' as being very similar. The word
translated `without God' is atheoi, to which we will return presently. What does `without
Christ' mean?  Out of its context it would spell simply damnation, and utter and
irrevocable loss; but in the confines of the subject before us it rather emphasizes the fact
that, whereas `according to the flesh' "Christ came" from Israel, the Gentile had no such
hope or privilege. The Scriptures had plainly revealed that the promised Seed of the
woman, should come through the line of David, of the tribe of Judah; consequently
Gentiles as such were `without a Messiah', Dr. J. Armitage Robinson reads verse twelve:
"That at that time without Christ ye were aliens from the commonwealth of Israel"
and says "A contrast is here drawn between their old position `at that time without
Christ' and their new position `now in Christ Jesus'. This contrast is somewhat obscured
if we render, as in the A.V. . . . . . they are called upon to remember not simply that they
were without Christ, but what they are without Christ."