| The Berean Expositor Volume 36 - Page 106 of 243 Index | Zoom | |
course would be conclusive if man did not alter frontiers by conquest or agreement, and if
the ancient boundaries of any particular country were always identical with modern
geography. The map above illustrates the position of Galatia as a kingdom, and the
extent of geographical and historical information possessed by Bible Students up to the
days of Dr. Kitto's Cyclopaedia 1847, or T. R. Birks, editor of Paley, 1849.
---Illustration---
(BE-XXXVI.208b).
By the year 1875 knowledge had so far increased that Lewin could publish in his "Life
and Epistles of Paul" two maps, one showing the national boundaries of Galatia, the
other the political boundaries, and it will be observed, that while the national boundaries
coincide with Kitto's map, the political map reveals many changes. We find that a part
of Phrygia had been incorporated in the enlarged Province of Galatia. The second map is
based upon the discoveries of Sir William Ramsay, and reveals that the Roman Province
extended so far south as to include as Galatian cities, Antioch, Lystra, Derbe and
Iconium. By the time we come to the New Edition of "Youngs Analytical Concordance"
only one map of Galatia is provided and that the largest Province including Antioch and
the other cities enumerated above.
Now Paul was a Roman citizen and knew the high value placed by all in the Empire
on that status, whatever their nationality might be. He could not, without offence, have
addressed one of the Churches of Galatia as "Phrygians", and it is practically impossible
that he would ever have thought of so doing. To him, Antioch, and the cities visited in
Acts 13: and 14: were in Galatia.
Now it is remarkable that recent archaeological discoveries in Asia Minor have
confirmed this point so that it has ceased to be a conjecture.
(1)
In 401A.D., Asterius, Bishop of Amaseia lived in Pontus, consequently he
knew at first hand the geography of his neighbourhood. Now by 401A.D.
there had taken place many changes, and Lycaonia did not at that date
belong to Galatia. The Bishop and all his readers knew this, yet in dealing
with Acts 18: 23, in direct contradiction to the facts of his own day, he
included Lycaonia in Galatia.
"No conceivable interpretation could get Lycaonia out of Galatiken
Choran except deliberate adhesion to the South Galatian view."
(2)
Ptolemy wrote concerning this part of the Roman world and arranged his
chapters according to the Roman Pro-consular divisions: The Pontus and
Bithynian Thesis, The Asian Thesis, The Lykian Thesis, The Galatian
Thesis.
We learn from Ptolemy that Galatia is bounded on the South by
Pamphylia, and on the North by the Euxine Sea. The Southern portion