The Berean Expositor
Volume 32 - Page 190 of 246
Index | Zoom
children" and "adoption of sons" we would draw attention to the fact that the difference
is found only in the English version: the Greek word itself is the same in every case.
If we found it impossible to confuse the company who have the adoption in Rom. 9:
with those who have in Gal. 3:, 4: and Heb. 3: 1 & 12:, much more shall we find it
impossible to confuse the high and holy calling that goes back before the foundation of
the world, and leads up to where Christ sits at the right hand of God, and which was a
mystery hid in God until revealed to the apostle Paul as the prisoner of Jesus Christ for us
Gentiles, with either of these two spheres. This third sphere of blessing belongs to the
dispensation of the Mystery. It has no connection with the promises made to the fathers
or with any covenant, old or new.
Once again, we pause. We have been reminded that there is a covenant in the
Scriptures that was made before Abraham, namely, the covenant made by God with
Noah, but whoever thinks that this covenant was made with an elect people needs to read
the Scriptures for himself, where he will find that it belongs to all mankind and so does
not come into the argument at all. They who snatch at such irrelevant items must be
destitute of sound reasons for their claims, and will only mislead those possessed of but
the smallest knowledge of the Scriptures, or who virtually wish to be thus persuaded.
This high calling of the mystery has its citizenship.
"Now therefore ye are no more strangers and foreigners, but fellow-citizens with the
saints and of the household of God" (Eph. 2: 19).
The citizenship of Israel is not in view here, neither is the citizenship of the
New Jerusalem, for this citizenship belongs to a sphere where Christ sits at the right hand
of God. This church is not actually called "The Firstborn", but as it forms the very body
of Christ, Who is revealed in Col. 1: as both Firstborn of all creation and Firstborn of the
dead, it amounts to the same thing. If, by virtue of the adoption, Israel has pre-eminence
over the nations, and if those whose sphere is the New Jerusalem have pre-eminence over
angels ("know ye not that we", the saints of the second sphere, the church during the Acts
period, "shall judge angels"?) (I Cor. 6: 3), then, by the analogy of faith, we shall expect
that those who have the adoption and citizenship in the highest sphere of all, will have a
corresponding pre-eminence. This indeed is the case for, in His capacity as Head of the
Church, which is His body (Eph. 1: 23), the ascended Christ is said to be set
"at His Own right hand in the heavenly places, far above all principality, and power, and
might, and dominion, and every name that is named" (Eph. 1: 20, 21).
and the Church is said to be "seated together in the heavenlies in Christ Jesus"
(Eph. 2: 6).  In this exalted sphere, neither nation nor angel is mentioned, but only the
spiritual rulers of glory. This is adoption indeed!
There is only one way in which the argument of this article can be overthrown, and
that is by showing that the Scriptures do not use the word "adoption" with intention and
with discrimination; or that Rom. 9:, Heb. 12: and Eph. 1: do not refer to three
distinct companies of believers.