| The Berean Expositor
Volume 32 - Page 103 of 246 Index | Zoom | |
Dr. Lightfoot gives a long list of laws and regulations regarding marriage, as found in
the Talmud and Rabbinical writings, but it is only the last of these that has any bearing
upon John 2:: "The nuptial festival was continued for the whole seven days: which we
also see of old (Judges 19: 12)." We have earlier evidence than the book of Judges, for
we find Laban saying to Jacob at the marriage of Leah, and also at his request for Rachel,
"Fulfil her week".
As seem to have been the case at Cana, it will easily be understood that at a festivity
extending over a period of seven days, the supply of wine might prematurely run out.
"And when they wanted wine, the mother of Jesus saith unto Him, They have no
wine" (2: 3).
The way in which Mary speaks and acts in this passage makes it fairly clear that she
was a relative of the household, and the fact that she told the Lord of the lack of wine
indicates that she was in expectation of some action on His part to remedy the fault, for
she knew of the baptism of John, the descent of the Spirit as a dove, and the attestation of
the Baptist and others. To our ears, the Saviour's reply sounds rather abrupt, but we must
remember that the use of the word "woman" was a respectful form of address, as can be
seen from 19: 26 and 20: 13, 15. We must also understand that these words were
spoken exclusively for Mary's ear, and that we have nothing to indicate the accompany
tone, inflection or look that so modify the spoken word. On more than one occasion the
Lord had to check the intrusion of even His own mother, into that sphere which lay
outside all earthly relationships. At the age of twelve, when Mary, having found Him in
the Temple, said, "Behold thy father and I have sought thee sorrowing", the Lord gently
told them that these home ties were to be broken and that He must soon be about His
Father's business (Luke 2: 48, 49). Similarly, on another occasion, when "His brethren
and His mother" sought Him, He answered "Who is my mother or my brethren?"
(Mark 3: 31-35). Again, the expression, "What have I to do with thee?" may not have
sounded so harsh in Mary's ear as in our's, for it seems to have been in Hebraism, and
therefore not to be taken by us too literally. It was used in II Sam. 16: 10 and 19: 22
by David, and in I Kings 17: 18, by the widow of Elijah. It was also used by the
demons who were cast out by the Lord (Matt. 8: 29; Mark 1: 24; Luke 4: 34). The
words were however decisive enough, and indicated that the Lord had now embarked
upon that ministry wherein the Father's will alone was supreme and which inflexibly led
on to the death of the cross. The words "Mine hour is not yet come" seem to suggest that
the cross was in mind, even at the marriage at Cana. Some have said that, in the present
case, no such solemn association must be read into the words, but the way in which this
saying recurs in this Gospel compels us to see in this occurrence, even at a festive
marriage scene, the shadow of the cross. Here are the eight occurrences of this or similar
expressions:
"Mine hour is not yet come."--Answer to mother's suggestion (John 2: 4).
"My time is not yet come."--Answer to brethren's suggestion (7: 6).
"My time is not yet full come."--Reason for secrecy at feast (7: 8).
"His hour not yet come."--Hence, no man laid hands on Him (7: 30).
"His hour was not yet come."--Hence, no man laid hands on Him (8: 20).
"The hour is come."--Greeks seek Him. Death mentioned (12: 23).