The Berean Expositor
Volume 29 - Page 87 of 208
Index | Zoom
We observe that we have here the "charge to build", the putting of the proclamation
into "writing", and the prayer, "The Lord his God be with him", all of which are
reminiscent of the opening section in connection with David. It is good to "see the end
from the beginning" and to know by the prophetic word that, after many days of apostacy
and rebellion, the time of restitution will surely come.
Returning to the beginning of the record, we come next to the transgression of
Rehoboam and the punishment executed upon him by Shishak king of Egypt, who carried
away the treasures of the house of the Lord.  Rehoboam and his princes humbled
themselves, however, and the Lord granted "some deliverance", or "deliverance for a
little while". Rehoboam's attitude here is in strong contrast with that described at the end
of the book, where we read of the king and his associates that, instead of humbling
themselves and repenting--
"They mocked the messengers of God, and despised His words, and misused His
prophets, until the wrath of the Lord arose against His people, TILL THERE WAS NO
REMEDY" (II Chron. 36: 16).
The acts of Abijah in chapter 13:, and the acts of Josiah in chapter 34: have this
in common, that both kings were zealous in witnessing against idolatry and in restoring
the worship of God in accordance with the law. Asa and Manasseh come next in the
structure and provide a picture of that mixture of good and bad that is often a link
between the true and the false. Jehoshaphat and Hezekiah are the next corresponding
members and form an obvious pair. In both cases we have the fear of an enemy, an
exhortation not to be afraid, the thought that "the battle is not yours, but God's"; and in
both cases we have the destruction of the enemy either by "ambushments", by angelic
ministry, or by patricidal murder. All these items are indicated in the structure and
should be checked.
We now come to the three central groups in the structure, that provide types of both
Christ and Antichrist. Athaliah and the destruction of the seed royal are a type of Satanic
opposition to the purposes of God in Christ, while the hiding of the infant king for six
years, and his proclamation in the seventh, will need no explanation to those who are
acquainted with prophecy. Ahaz stands in line with Athaliah as a type of Antichrist, and
the "hiding" of the king's son is echoed by the "shutting up" of the doors of the Lord's
house. Hezekiah follows in much the same steps as Joash in the cleansing of the Temple,
the gathering of the Levites, and the setting in order of the Lord's house. All these points
are noted in the outline already given.
The four kings that come centrally in the structure are important because of the way in
which they indicate the various phases of Antichrist's rebellion and opposition. It should
be noted that the name of the evil king of Israel here, is the same as that of the good king
of Judah. This is a fruitful cause of much evil. Satan's deception is carried out by means
of travesty. Let the reader compare, for example, the names of the descendants of Cain
given in Gen. 4: 16-24, with those of the descendants of Adam given in Gen. 5: To
make sure that there is no mistake in connection with Enoch the Scriptures refer to him as