| The Berean Expositor
Volume 27 - Page 66 of 212 Index | Zoom | |
The two and a half tribes vehemently repudiate the charge of rebellion, and deny that
there had been any intention of using the altar for sacrificial purposes; it had been built
in order that their children in days to come should realize that they still had part with the
tribes across Jordan.
"Behold the pattern of the altar of the Lord, which our fathers made, not for burnt
offerings, nor for sacrifices; but it is a witness between us and you" (Josh. 22: 28).
This explanation satisfies Phinehas and he says:
"This day we perceive that the Lord is among us, because ye have not committed this
trespass against the Lord" (Josh. 22: 31).
How are we to regard this question of the building of the altar? The Law of Moses
most certainly forbad the offering of sacrifice anywhere else but at the door of the
tabernacle (Lev. 17: 8, 9). Were the two and a half tribes justified in partly
transgressing this commandment? With the fact of the history of Israel before us, and the
knowledge of how easily they lapsed into idolatry, we cannot but feel that the erection of
this altar was a sad mistake, and that no policy can justify departure from any
commandment of the Lord. The Companion Bible expresses no opinion on the question.
Some commentators are very much in its favour, others strongly condemn. It is difficult,
perhaps, to avoid the charge of being uncharitable, but we cannot help feeling that,
however good the intentions of the builders might have been, the whole action was a
mistake. Anything in the nature of putting out one's hand to stay the ark of God,
however, well intentioned, is wrong. The whole trouble seems to have been the natural
fruit of their initial act of self-will. In Num. 32: 1 there are arguments that remind us
strongly of Lot's fatal choice, and Moses denounces their choice as but a repetition of the
false action of the ten spies (Num. 32: 14). It is true that an agreement was made with
these tribes, and that the land of their choice was granted to them; nevertheless, we have
learned both from experience and from the Scriptures that self-willed choice, even if it is
permitted, generally ends in disaster. In all this history there is much that reminds us of
those in Phil. 3:, who minded earthly things, instead of being willing to forego all
inheritance until over Jordan and in the land of promise.
The Book of Joshua concludes with an address by Joshua to all the people, in which
he warns them of the results of departure from the Lord, and encourages them to adhere
closely to all that had been written in the law. The passage ends with a solemn covenant
on the part of the people, and the setting up of a great stone as a witness.
At the age of one hundred and ten years Joshua dies and is buried in the border of his
inheritance. The bones of Joseph are buried in Shechem; and Eleazar the Priest is buried
in mount Ephraim.
"And Israel served the Lord all the days of Joshua, and all the days of the elders that
overlived Joshua, and which had known all the works of the Lord, that He had done for
Israel" (Josh. 24: 31).