The Berean Expositor
Volume 23 - Page 48 of 207
Index | Zoom
A request is next sent to Sihon, King of the Amorites, couched in terms almost
identical with those used for Edom. The request is refused, Sihon comes out and fights
against Israel; and Israel smites him with the edge of the sword, and takes possession
of his territory.  What Israel took from Sihon had originally belonged to Moab
(Numb. 21: 26), who had become idolatrous, as we see from Numb. 21: 28, 29: "The
lords (baalim) of the high places of Arnon . . . . . O people of Chemosh" (Chemosh being
an idol, II Kings 23: 13).
This was a legitimate conquest on this side of Jordan before the land of promise was
reached; and the Church to-day, while not forgetting the restrictions associated with
Moab and Edom, can win back territory which was lost to Satan and his hosts, which
once belonged to the outer circle of God's people.
Og, King of Bashan, also went out against Israel, and he, too, was overcome and
destroyed. This king was the last of the Rephaim; his bedstead (or tomb) was nine cubits
long, "after the cubit of a man".
The destruction of Sihon and Og is commemorated in a psalm of praise, which
specially emphasizes the mercy of God.
"To Him which smote great kings:
For His mercy endureth for ever:
And slew famous kings:
For His mercy endureth for ever:
Sihon, King of the Amorites:
For His mercy endureth for ever:
And Og, King of Bashan:
For His mercy endureth for ever" (Psa. 136: 17-20).
This seed of the giants, the Rephaim, were the tares sown by the Wicked One; it was
mercy utterly to destroy them. And so, when the day arrives for the Church to ascend
into the heavenly inheritance, the principalities and powers, the world holders of this
darkness and the "spiritual wickednesses" that have, under the authority of Satan, for so
long barred the way, shall in like manner be destroyed. Already by the cross they have
been "spoiled" and "triumphed over" (Col. 2: 15). For the present time our orders are to
"stand", to "stand against" and to "withstand".
If it was vital that Israel should follow out implicitly the instructions given them in
their passage from the wilderness to the promised land, it is surely equally important that
we also should neither exceed nor fall short of the instructions given for our own
guidance. The teaching that some hold regarding "warfare" to-day, is as though Israel,
long before the arrival at Kadesh, marched forward indiscriminately with sword in hand,
simply because they knew that over the Jordan lay their inheritance and that even then
they were really "more than conquerors".
We have touched, in passing, upon each of the opposing forces met by Israel, but so
much is involved in the action of Balak and Balaam that this must be reserved for
separate study in a subsequent paper.