Is this just criticism? If we say that certain features in Romans are transitional, we are

said to be "wrecking" the book, even though we "build" upon it. Yet our critic can say

that "we should not build upon all the doctrines of the transitional era".

Our critic has also something to say concerning our articles on Satan and the Mystery.

He is apparently unable to distinguish between our position in Christ, which is

unassailable, the possibility of stepping out into the flesh, where we can give place to the

devil, and the conflict that must be endured by those who are engaged in the service of

the Lord.

We now conclude this "defence" with the suggestion that we unite in prayer that the

Lord will open the eyes of us all, his as well as ours.