The Berean Expositor
Volume 4 & 5 - Page 79 of 161
Index | Zoom
prerogatives; it may be, however, that he has been blamed by Commentators for that
which he did not intend. Cain was protected by the Lord, a token was appointed for him
in mercy (nearly every one speaks of the "brand of Cain" as though God set a mark upon
him in wrath), the word mark in Gen. 4: 15 being the word token, used of the bow in the
clouds (Gen. 9: 12), and of the blood of the passover (Exod. 12: 13). Lamech seems to
say to his wives, Be still, fear not, for if Cain who was a murderer was thus protected by a
sevenfold avenging, surely I shall be avenged seven and seventy-fold; for the words
relative to the slaying and wounding in verse 23 may indicate to a query rather then a
state a fact. There seems to be an emphasis, markedly so in the case of Cain, upon the
great longsuffering and mercy of our gracious God.
The other reference to this seventy times seven is found in Dan. 9:, and there in a
light infinitely worse than that of Cain or of Lamech. The Lord intervenes and tells the
anxious prophet that his prayers shall receive an abundant answer. Daniel had prayed for
the forgiveness of his people (9: 19), and in answer the angel Gabriel is sent to reveal the
future of his people to him. "Seventy-sevens are severed off upon thy people and upon
thy holy city." Seventy-sevens ­ the period of time seems to convey also some lesson of
the Lord's longsuffering and forbearance with His rebellious people. If ever a people
could be expected to exercise forgiveness to others Israel surely should be the first, for
have they not had extended to them untold forbearance from a longsuffering God? The
Lord did not omit this from the kingdom prayer of Matt. 6:, "Forgive us our debts, as we
forgive our debtors" has a direct bearing upon the parable of the servant who, having
been forgiven "all that debt," would not forgive his fellow-servant who was his debtor to
a much less extent. How many of our readers could say, without reference, what one
clause of the Lord's prayer is immediately expanded after the conclusion of the petition?
It is not the reference to hallowing the Name, nor the coming kingdom, but just this very
clause:--
"For if ye forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you, but
if ye forgive not men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses."
These words are echoed in the closing verse of Matt. 18: Here in this parable we
have in all its hatefulness one of the factors of Israel's failure. They forgave not; they
were not forgiven. Their measure of iniquity was filled up when in their implacable
antagonism to the widening mercy of God they forbade the apostle to speak to the
Gentiles that they might be saved, and so wrath came upon them to the uttermost
(I Thess. 2: 16). This passage from I Thessalonians should read with the parable before
us, when the "wrath to the uttermost" echoed in the words, "His lord was wroth," and
"till he should pay all that was due unto him." This last clause compels us to consider
another passage in the Sermon on the Mount, that message calculated to reveal the failure
of Israel's attempt at attaining a righteousness by law, and to bring them to repentance.
In Matt. 5: 22 the Lord says:--
"But I say unto you (in contradistinction to what had been taught them), that
whosoever is angry with his brother shall be liable to the judgment."
The words "without a cause" must be omitted; anger is to be "put away," whether with
or without a cause. Continuing the Lord said:--