There is an ominous pause of a century before we come to the next work of this class, which
bears the title of the Fourth Book of Esdras. That century had been decisive in the history of
Israel. Jesus had lived and died; His Apostles had gone forth to bear the tidings of the new
Kingdom of God; the Church had been founded and separated from the Synagogue; and the
Temple had been destroyed, the Holy City laid waste, and Israel undergone sufferings,
compared with which the former troubles might almost be forgotten. But already the new
doctrine had struck its roots deep alike in Eastern and in Hellenistic soil. It were strange indeed
if, in such circumstances, this book should not have been different from any that had preceded
it; stranger still, if earnest Jewish minds and ardent Jewish hearts had remained wholly
unaffected by the new teaching, even though the doctrine of the Cross still continued a
stumbling-block, and the Gospel announcement a rock of offence. But perhaps we could
scarcely have been prepared to find, as in the Fourth Book of Esdras, doctrinal views which
were wholly foreign to Judaism, and evidently derived from the New Testament, and which, in
logical consistency, would seem to lead up to it.52 The greater part of the book may be
described as restless tossing, the seer being agitated by the problem and the consequences of
sin, which here for the first and only time is presented as in the New Testament; by the question,
why there are so few who are saved; and especially by what to a Jew must have seemed the
inscrutable, terrible mystery of Israel's sufferings and banishment.53 Yet, so far as we can see,
no other way of salvation is indicated than that by works and personal righteousness.
Throughout there is a tone of deep sadness and intense earnestness. It almost seems sometimes,
as if one heard the wind of the new dispensation sweeping before it the withered leaves of
Israel's autumn. Thus far for the principal portion of the book. The second, or Apocalyptic,
part, endeavors to solve the mystery of Israel's state by foretelling their future. Here also there
are echoes of New Testament utterances. What the end is to be, we are told in unmistakable
language. His `Son,' Whom the Highest has for a long time preserved, to deliver `the creature'
by Him, is suddenly to appear in the form of a Man. From His mouth shall proceed alike woe,
fire, and storm, which are the tribulations of the last days. And as they shall gather for war
against Him, He shall stand on Mount Zion, and the Holy City shall come down from heaven,
prepared and ready, and He shall destroy all His enemies. But a peaceable multitude shall now
be gathered to Him. These are the ten tribes, who, to separate themselves from the ways of the
heathen, had wandered far away, miraculously helped, a journey of one and a half years, and
who were now similarly restored by God to their own land. But as for the `Son,' or those who
accompanied him, no one on earth would be able to see or know them, till the day of His
appearing.54 55
52. The doctrinal part of IV. Esdras may be said to be saturated with the dogma of original sin, which is
wholly foreign to the theology alike of Rabbinic and Hellenistic Judaism. Comp. Vis. i. ch. iii. 21, 22; iv.
30, 38; Vis. iii. ch. vi, 18, 19 (ed. Fritzsche, p. 607); 33-41; vii. 46-48; viii. 34-35.
53. It almost seems as if there were a parallelism between this book and the Epistle to the Romans, which
in its dogmatic part, seems successively to take up these three subjects, although from quite another
point of view. How different the treatment is, need not be told.
54. Vis. vi. ch. xiii. 27-52.