Levend Water
The Apostle of the Reconciliation - Charles H. Welch
Index - Page 5 of 159
5
FOREWORD
______
The purpose of the present Volume.
In the Volume entitled Dispensational Truth we were not able to do more than take a wide view of the general
trend of Scripture. We observed the working out of a purpose, and saw that it was carried forward to a conclusion
under a series of dispensations, and were enabled to see that `the Jew, Gentile, and Church of God' indicated
dispensational distinctions which are of first importance to observe.
The present Volume deals mainly with the Church of God, and with that set of Scriptures which is bounded by
the history of the Acts of the Apostles. The epistles of Paul which were written during or after his imprisonment
belong to a dispensation which was not instituted until the ministry of the Acts period had come to a close. Their
study demands separate treatment, and the present Volume will be useful largely in clearing the way for their
examination, and in showing the foundation upon which they are built.
In a former Volume we were content to speak of the `generally accepted order of the epistles of Paul', but in this
Volume the chronology both of the Acts and the Epistles will form a subject for enquiry. The first part of this
Volume will be taken up with matters which are mainly chronological, geographical, and critical. We can fully
sympathize with those who, having tasted the blessings which were promised before the age times, will not feel very
interested in the dates of the Acts; and who, having realized that their citizenship is in heaven, will have lost interest
in the townships and colonies of the earth. Yet the highest pinnacle of blessedness revealed in the epistles of the
mystery is founded upon historic facts which were enacted in geographical places by real persons, whose names and
titles, lives and deaths, occur in the annals of secular Roman history.
What heart-moving doctrines arise out of the resurrection of the Lord Jesus! Yet we must keep prominently
before us that the resurrection is not a beautiful, soul-stirring theory, but a fact of history as unsentimental and as
unalterable as `1066, William the Conqueror'. Doctrines deduced from facts may change, but the facts themselves
remain unaltered. The doctrines that arise out of them are only possible and practicable because the transaction is a
fact of history. Notice the way in which the apostle establishes the fact of the resurrection of the Lord before he
proceeds to deal with its effects. Having cited a whole series of witnesses he follows with a statement to the effect
that if Christ be not risen from the dead :
1.
Then is our preaching vain;
2.
Your faith is vain;
3.
We are found false witnesses of God;
4.
Ye are yet in your sins;
5.
They which are fallen asleep in Christ are perished.
Not only do we need to realize the foundation upon which our faith rests (to say nothing of the finer
dispensational sub-divisions which are our more immediate concern), but also to remember that we are facing days
when the truth of God will be rejected, undermined, and explained away, so that from all standpoints a thorough
examination of the basis of our position seems desirable. We therefore turn our attention to the Acts of the Apostles,
considering its authorship and object, the chronology of the various events of the book, and the chronological order
of the epistles.
The important question of the dating of the epistles cannot be approached without reference to geography; in
fact, the accepted dating of one epistle is the result of meagre geographical evidence which made a late date at the
time a necessity. We speak of the epistle to the Galatians, which will be dealt with in its place. The dispensational
changes indicated by the narrative are connected with various nations and countries, all of which demand careful
examination.
When these preliminary studies have been undertaken we shall be in a position to consider more closely the
epistles of the period, and their doctrine, practice, and dispensation will be grasped the better for our having given
time and attention to these less interesting opening studies.