An Alphabetical Analysis
Volume 7 - Doctrinal Truth - Page 48 of 297
INDEX
second lesson.  The Haphtorah in Genesis 1-6:8 has 35 verses, the one that
follows has 22, and so on.  On the other hand another statement reads 'If
there be an interpreter, or preaching on the sabbath day, they read out of
the prophets, three, or five, or seven verses, and are not so careful to read
just one-and-twenty'.  The portion which the Saviour read as an 'Interpreter
and Preacher' was Isaiah 61, the whole of what corresponds to verse 1, and
one third of the second verse!  This was a short reading indeed, consequently
Luke 4:20 continues 'And the eyes of all them that were in the synagogue were
fastened on Him', and the interpretation that followed revealed how
completely the Saviour 'rightly divided the Word of Truth'.  In the first
place, the passage chosen is in strong contrast with the words associated
with the Saviour's opening ministry in Matthew.  Both writers record the
temptation in the wilderness, both give a quotation from Isaiah, both
introduce the Gentile (Matt. 4:15; Luke 4:25-27), but Galilee of the Gentiles
was still the land of Israel, whereas Naaman the leper was a Syrian, and
Sarepta was a city of Sidon.  Moreover, the quoted words of Christ at the
opening of His ministry are of extreme importance providing as they do an
index of what was to follow.  Matthew records these words: 'Repent, for the
kingdom of heaven is at hand' (Matt. 4:17).  Luke records these:
'The Spirit of the Lord is upon Me, because He hath anointed Me to
preach the Gospel to the poor; He hath sent Me to heal the
brokenhearted, to preach deliverance to the captives, and recovery of
sight to the blind, to set at liberty them that are bruised, To Preach
the Acceptable Year of the Lord' (Luke 4:18,19).
A reference back to Isaiah 61 shows that the Lord stopped abruptly at
the end of the first sentence of verse 2, closed the book and sat down.  The
words immediately following were 'And the day of vengeance of our God', but
had He thus read on, it would not have been possible for Him to have said
'This day is this Scripture fulfilled in your ears', for it is utterly
impossible to interpret the words of Isaiah 61:2, without discriminating
between the 'acceptable year' and 'the day of vengeance of our God'.  No
greater warrant for Dispensational Truth can be wanted by any who honour the
Saviour as Lord; no clearer endorsement of the principle of Right Division is
found in the rest of the New Testament than this initial interpretation of
the Saviour at the opening of His public ministry.
Dektos, the Greek word translated 'acceptable' is part of a large
family of words that descend from dechomai 'to receive'.  Dektos is repeated
in Luke 4:24 'No prophet is accepted in his own country', a word of warning,
lest we expect this gracious proclamation of the 'acceptable year of the
Lord' to be found immediately acceptable to 'His own'.  'The common people'
we read, 'heard Him gladly' (Mark 12:37), and in Luke 8:40, we read 'The
people gladly received (apodechomai) Him'.  The sin of the rejection of
Christ lies mainly at the door of the rulers of the people, although once
again there were blessed exceptions, Nicodemus being one, Joseph of
Arimathaea being another of whom it is written that he himself also 'waited
for' (prosdechomai) the kingdom of God (Luke 23:51).  The Old Testament word
'acceptable', Hebrew ratson, is variously translated acceptable, delight,
favour, good will, etc., and is particularly associated with the acceptance
of a worshipper on the basis of sacrifice offered on his behalf (Exod. 28:38;
Lev. 22:21; 23:11).  The 'acceptable year of the Lord' was such because of
the Offering that the Saviour had come to make.  The alternative was 'the day
of vengeance'.