| An Alphabetical Analysis Volume 6 - Doctrinal Truth - Page 99 of 270 INDEX | |
(2)
The meaning of the actual passage itself.
(3)
The evidence that the A.V. gives the correct reading.
There are two passages in the R.V. in which the hand of the modernist
is evident. They are 1 Timothy 3:16 and 2 Timothy 3:16. In the first there
is an attack upon the Deity of Christ, and in the second there is an attack
upon the Scriptures of God. We know not when the storm will break, but we
are persuaded that the Enemy of Truth has singled out these two truths for
special attack, and while time and opportunity remain, we desire, as unto the
Lord, to make it plain where we stand on the vital issues involved. For the
moment we concentrate our attention upon 1 Timothy 3:16.
The testimony of the structure
It is possible to give so much proof that the untrained mind may be
bewildered rather than convinced. To avoid this, we first draw attention to
the essential feature of the structure of the Epistle.
A
1:17. The King of the Ages, Incorruptible,
invisible.
Honour and glory, to the ages of the ages.
B
3:16. God was manifested in the Flesh
seen.
A
6:15,16. King of kings Immortal,
unseen.
Honour and might, age -lasting.
These are the great focal points around which the remainder of the
structure is grouped. We will not set out the complete literary structure of
1 Timothy, but the interested reader will find it in full in Vol. 32 of
The Berean Expositor under the title The Mystery Manifested No. 11. For the
moment we perceive that the Epistle opens and closes with a doxology that
ascribes, among other things, Invisibility to God, but contains in its centre
a revelation of the vital truth of the Saviour's Person and Office as the one
Mediator, where instead of invisibility and unapproachable light, we have God
Manifest and Seen.
The meaning of 1 Timothy 3:16
We now pass from the testimony of the structure to
the text itself. Chapter 3 is largely devoted to the qualifications of
bishops and deacons, and the apostle states that he has so written that
Timothy may know how to behave himself in the house of God, which is the
church of the living God. A question now arises from the last clause of
verse 15. Is the church 'the pillar and ground of the truth'? If we use the
word 'church' in its most spiritual meaning, we shall find no basis in
Scripture for such an important doctrine. The case before us, however, is
most certainly not 'the Church' but 'a church', a church wherein there are
bishops and deacons; a church in which Timothy could 'behave' himself; in
other words, a local assembly, and surely it is beyond all argument that the
truth does not rest upon any such church as its pillar and ground! The
reader will observe that in the complete structure, 3:15 is divided between D
and E, and that the latter part of verse 15 belongs to verse 16. There is no
definite article before the word 'pillar', and a consistent translation is as
follows. Having finished what he had to say about the officers of the church
and Timothy's behaviour, he turns to the great subject of the Mystery of
godliness with the words: