An Alphabetical Analysis
Volume 6 - Doctrinal Truth - Page 95 of 270
INDEX
'When you go through the cloisters, into the second temple there was a
Partition made of stone all round, whose height was three cubits; its
construction was very elegant, upon it stood pillars, at equal
distances from one another, declaring the law of purity, some in Greek
and some in Roman letters, that "No foreigner should go within the
sanctuary"'
(Josephus Wars, V. 5.2).
This middle wall the apostle likens to the law of commandments
contained in 'ordinances'.  Here again we must exercise care.  It has become
common among Christians to refer to baptism and the Lord's Supper as
'ordinances'; the note in the Oxford Dictionary 1830 reads, 'applied
especially to the sacrament of the Lord's Supper'.  It is extremely unlikely
that, when the translators of the A.V. used the word 'ordinance', such an
application of the term would have entered their minds.  The Greek word
translated 'ordinance' is dogma, a word having nothing in common with the
ordinances of baptism and the Lord's Supper, but meaning 'that which appears
good or right to one' (Lloyds Encyclopaedic Dictionary).  Dogma must not be
confounded with doctrine.  Crabb discriminates between dogma and doctrine
thus:
'A doctrine rests upon the authority of the individual by whom it is
framed; a dogma on the authority of the body by whom it is maintained'.
Dr. Bullinger in his Lexicon says:
Dogma, that which seems true to one, an opinion, especially of
philosophic dogmas: a public resolution, decree (see Luke 2:1; Acts
16:4; 17:7).
We have this word employed for 'the decrees' of Caesar, for 'the
decrees' delivered to the church, and this reference takes us to Acts 15,
where we shall find a decree resting on the authority of a body by whom it
was maintained, to quote Crabb, and 'that which appears
good and right to one', as already quoted from Lloyds Encyclopaedic
Dictionary.  The council met at Jerusalem to decide what measures could be
taken to solve the problems that arose out of the coming into the church of
Gentiles, whose whole upbringing, feeding and habits rendered them obnoxious
to their Jewish fellows.  To quote this time from the ordinance itself given
in Acts 15, 'It seemed good unto us, being assembled with one accord ... to
lay upon you no greater burden than these necessary things' (Acts 15:25 -28),
and with this the Holy Spirit concurred (verse 28).  While there were four
items of conduct prescribed for the Gentiles, the added comment, 'for Moses
of old time hath in every city them that preach him' (Acts 15:21), suggests
that the Jewish believer would continue to observe the full ceremonial law.
This difference between the two companies of believers set up in effect a
middle wall of partition, making membership of a joint -Body during the Acts
impossible.  It is this 'decree' which is the ordinance referred to in
Ephesians 2:15.  This has now been abolished.
This word 'abolished' translates the Greek katargeo which means rather
'to render inoperative', as can be seen in such passages as Romans 7:2,
'loosed from the law', 'done away' (2 Cor. 3:7,11,13,14) and 'to make of
none effect' (Gal. 3:17; 5:4).  The temporary measures introduced by the
Council at Jerusalem were abrogated when the truth for the present
dispensation was revealed, and this abrogation was seen to have been
accomplished, even as access into the true Tabernacle had been accomplished,