An Alphabetical Analysis
Volume 5 - Dispensational Truth - Page 76 of 328
INDEX
referred to The Berean Expositor Vol. 9, pages 51 and 81, or to The Testimony
of the Lord's Prisoner chapter 7.  Ephesians 2:1 does not say what we were
but what we are, the A.V. having translated the present participle ontas
`being', by the past `were' for which there is no justification.  We go back
to the past in verses 2 and 3 where in both verses we are referred to `time
past'.  Here we are on solid ground and know without peradventure that these
two verses speak of our original state before grace found us.
There is a reason why the reference back to `time past' should be
divided under two headings, for verse 2 looks at the external forces that
moulded and influenced our lives, while verse 3 speaks of the internal co -
operating forces that allied themselves with our evil environment and made
our case so hopeless.
Let us see this.
Ephesians 2:2,3.
A
In time past.
B
Walk.
a
age of world.
`according to'
b
Prince of power of air.
C
Sons of disobedience.
A
In times past.
B
Conversation.
a
lust of flesh.
`in'
b
Will of flesh and mind.
C
Children of wrath.
Here it will be observed are two points of view.  In the first the
manner of life is called a `walk', in the second it is called a
`conversation'.  In the first, the walk is `according to' external
influences.  In the second, the conversation is `in' the forces that work
within.  The external influences are `the age of this world' and `the Prince
of the authority of the air'.  The internal influences are `the lusts of the
flesh' and the `fulfilling of the desires of the flesh and of the mind'.  The
mighty spirit power that rules the darkness of this world is the influence
`according to' which we once were led, and this spirit is the one who
actually `energizes' those who are called `the sons of disobedience'.  Those
who are actuated by flesh and mind are said to be `by nature' `children of
wrath' like the rest.
The reader who has learned to realize the fulness of Scripture will
readily understand that we have here a far reaching subject if we are to
analyse and differentiate between each of these related subjects.  To give
all the time and space which the subject demands may be outside our power,
but we cannot feel that we shall have discharged the obligations of our
stewardship by leaving matters where they are.  Consequently, though our
comments must be brief we trust they will be of help in enabling us to get a
fairly true picture of what we once were, so that when the Selah of Ephesians
2:4 is faced, we shall the better realize what `quickening Love' has wrought.
`Walk'.  Our past life is likened in verse 2 to a walk, and this word
is used in the Prison Epistles four times to speak of the walk that is evil
and nine times to speak of the walk that is good.  For the moment we are
concerned with the walk that characterized the past and therefore we must
read these four passages together.