| An Alphabetical Analysis Volume 3 - Dispensational Truth - Page 169 of 222 INDEX | |
We have seen that the promise to Abraham concerning his seed, has
followed the same pattern that has characterized the earlier moves in the
outworking of the purpose. Their failure came to a head just before the
Babylonian captivity and, with Nebuchadnezzar, `the times of the Gentiles'
began:
`In the third year of the reign of Jehoiakim king of Judah came
Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon unto Jerusalem, and besieged it. And
the Lord gave Jehoiakim king of Judah into his hand, with part of the
vessels of the house of God: which he carried into the land of Shinar
to the house of his god' (Dan. 1:1,2).
With these words the book of Daniel opens, and it may not be too much
to say that they are only paralleled by the words of Acts 28 in their burden
of crisis and dispensational change. With such vast issues hanging upon
these momentous words, vast because they cover the whole sweep of Gentile
dominion, and vaster still because they lead steadily on to that kingdom of
Christ which is to last for ever; with such issues and such a burden, no
pains should be spared in acquainting ourselves with all that God has written
for our learning in relation to this crisis in the history of man. Space
will not permit of the full quotation of Jeremiah 25:1 -26. We can but point
out one or two features that connect this passage with the opening words of
Daniel.
The reader will be struck by the fact that whereas Daniel 1:1 speaks of
the `third' year of Jehoiakim, Jeremiah 25:1 speaks of the `fourth' year of
that same king in connection with the coming of Nebuchadnezzar against
Jerusalem. This apparent discrepancy has not passed unnoticed by the critic,
being one of his many `proofs' of the untrustworthiness of the book of
Daniel.
The Hebrew word translated `came' in Daniel 1:1 is bo, and it
frequently has the sense of `went' or `marched'. This, however, has been
denied. Dr. Samuel Davidson says, `the verb bo does not mean to set out ...
but to arrive at' ... (Introduction to the Old Testament, Vol. III, p. 181),
and, when men of such standing and authority speak thus, who are we to oppose
them? Humility is indeed a grace to seek and preserve, but while Galatians 2
remains for our encouragement, we may still dare to bring all statements to
the touchstone of the Word. Dr. Davidson's statement but illustrates the
uncritical character of so -called `higher criticism' for it has been
computed that the Hebrew word bo is used in the sense of `to set out' in each
of the five books of Moses, in Joshua, Judges, Ruth, Samuel, Kings,
Chronicles, Ezra, Nehemiah, Esther, Job, Psalms, Proverbs, Isaiah, Jeremiah,
Ezekiel, and in six out of the twelve minor prophets!
Let us look at Jonah 1:3 and translate it as Dr. Davidson would have
it: `And Jonah ... went down to Joppa, and he found a ship arriving at
Tarshish'! If this could be sense, then in some miraculous way Jonah would
have no sooner set foot on board at Joppa than he would have `arrived' at
Tarshish.
Doubtless this would have made the journey far more pleasant than it
actually was, but the simple fact is that the Hebrew word bo does mean that
the ship was `going' or `setting out' for Tarshish. The plain fact of Daniel
1 and Jeremiah 25 is that the former writer tells us the year in which
Nebuchadnezzar `set out' from Babylon, while the latter tells us when he