An Alphabetical Analysis
Volume 10 - Practical Truth - Page 243 of 277
INDEX
The second mood is suited to the discovery or proof of the distinctions
that exist between things.  Its construction is as follows:
No B is C ... 'The Mystery' is not revealed in the Old Testament.
All A is B ... 'Gentiles in heavenly places' is part of 'the Mystery'.
Therefore
No A is C ... 'Gentiles in heavenly places' is not revealed in the Old
Testament.
Here we must imagine two concentric circles B and A with one separate
circle C standing apart.
The third mood is suited to the discovery or proof of instances and
exceptions.  Its construction is as follows:
All B is C ... The doctrine of redemption belongs to the whole Bible.
Some A is B ... Some of the teaching of the Mystery is the doctrine of
redemption.
Therefore
Some A is C ... Some of the teaching of the Mystery will be found in
the Bible.
It will be seen that this form of argument is adapted to exceptions.
As a revelation, the Mystery does not form a part of all Scripture, but
belongs to the prison ministry of Paul.  There is need, however, to
distinguish between the doctrinal basis which it shares in common with other
callings, and that dispensational superstructure that constitutes its
distinctive feature.
The fourth mood is suited to the discovery of the exclusion of
different species of a genus.  Its construction is as follows:
No B is C ... No covenants are found in the Mystery.
Some A is B ... Some Scriptural blessings are new covenant blessings.
Therefore
Some A is not C ... Some Scriptural blessings are not found in the
Mystery.
These four forms constitute the four moods of the first figure of the
syllogism, and, as all propositions may be reduced to one or other of these
forms, we shall not pursue the matter further.  'If an argument can be
analysed into these forms, and you admit its propositions, you are bound in
consistency to admit the conclusion' (Minto).
The axiom of the syllogism has been expressed in many ways; perhaps the
easiest is the following: 'What is said of a whole, is said of every one of
its parts'.  If you admit that a leaf is in a book, and that the same book is
in your pocket, you admit that the leaf must be in your pocket also.